|
|
注册免广告
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看，没有账号？注册
×
本帖最后由 HelloWorld 于 2024-11-18 15:00 编辑
Part 1
The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
| 我的原文 | GPT-4o 修改单词和语法错误 | The picture illustrates the numbers of shop closures and openings from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, the number of closure and openings decreased over these years, though in some years, saw increases.
In 2011, number of openings was around 8600, while the number of openings was smaller, about 6400. The followed years from 2012 to 2014, in contrast, the number of closures exceeded openings. Moreover, in 2012, openings saw a significantly decrease, to a number no more than 4000, but it increased to more than 6000 in 2014.
In 2015, there was a huge decrease of the number of shop closures, which was from about 6600 in 2014 to about 600 in 2015, that means greater than 90% decrease! While the number of openings saw a vital decrease too. In contrast, the number of closures increased sharply from 2015 to 2016, reached around 5200, and kept a relative constant number until 2018. Meanwhile, the number of openings was stable from 2015 to 2017, just decreased in 2018.
| The picture illustrates the numbers of shop closures and openings from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, the numbers of closures and openings decreased over these years, though some years saw increases.
In 2011, the number of closures was around 6,400, while the number of openings was higher, about 8,600. In the following years from 2012 to 2014, in contrast, the number of closures exceeded openings. Moreover, in 2012, openings saw a significant decrease to a number no more than 4,000, but it increased to more than 6,000 in 2014.
In 2015, there was a huge decrease in the number of shop closures, which dropped from about 6,600 in 2014 to about 600 in 2015, meaning a decrease of more than 90%! Meanwhile, the number of openings saw a similar decrease. In contrast, the number of closures increased sharply from 2015 to 2016, reaching around 5,200, and remained relatively constant until 2018. Meanwhile, the number of openings was stable from 2015 to 2017, only decreasing in 2018.
| 预估得分：GPT-4o 5.5-6；Claude 6-6.5；Copilot 6；Gemini 5.5-6
| 预估得分：GPT-4o 6-6.5；Claude 6.5-7；Copilot 7；Gemini 6.5-7
|
GPT-4o 7 分范文：
The line graph illustrates the number of shop closures and openings in a specific country from 2011 to 2018. Overall, it can be observed that both closures and openings showed considerable fluctuations throughout the period, with closures peaking at the start and then gradually declining towards the end of the timeframe, while openings exhibited a downward trend with some temporary increases.
In 2011, the number of shop closures stood at approximately 6,500, while openings were higher, at around 8,500. By 2012, closures slightly decreased to 6,000, whereas openings dropped more significantly, reaching about 4,000. Over the next two years, openings experienced a steady increase, peaking at roughly 6,500 in 2014, while closures remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 6,000 and 7,000.
In 2015, closures saw a dramatic decrease to a low point of about 500, marking the smallest figure for any category throughout the period. Conversely, openings experienced a substantial decline to just below 4,000. After 2015, both figures began to stabilize, with openings fluctuating between 3,000 and 4,000 from 2016 to 2018, while closures remained relatively steady at around 5,000, ending at around 4,000 in 2018.
In summary, although both shop closures and openings experienced ups and downs, closures generally trended downward by the end of the period, while openings saw an overall decrease from the initial high in 2011.
|
Claude 7 分范文：
The line graph illustrates the trends in shop closures and openings in a particular country over an eight-year period from 2011 to 2018.
The most striking feature is the dramatic fluctuation in shop closures, particularly the sharp decline in 2015 when the number dropped to approximately 700 units from about 6,500 in 2014. However, closures rebounded significantly in 2016 to around 5,000 shops and remained relatively stable until 2018, hovering around the 5,000 mark.
As for shop openings, the trend shows an overall decline throughout the period. The number of new shops started at its peak of roughly 8,500 in 2011 and decreased substantially to about 4,000 by 2012. Although there was a recovery period between 2012 and 2014, reaching about 6,000 openings, the figures subsequently declined again. By 2018, new shop openings had fallen to approximately 3,000 units, the lowest point in the period.
Interestingly, while both metrics showed considerable volatility, the gap between closures and openings generally narrowed over the eight-year period, with closures consistently exceeding openings from 2016 onwards, indicating a net reduction in the total number of shops.
|
Copilot 7 分范文：
The line graph illustrates the number of shop closures and openings in one country from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, the data reveals fluctuating trends in both shop openings and closures throughout the period, with a notable decrease in the number of openings and a fluctuating but generally stable trend in closures by the end of the period.
In 2011, there were approximately 8,500 new shops opening, while the number of closures was slightly lower, at around 6,000. The subsequent year saw a dramatic fall in the number of new shops, which plummeted to 4,000 in 2012, whereas the number of closures remained relatively unchanged. From 2012 to 2014, the number of openings experienced a recovery, peaking at 6,500 in 2014. In contrast, shop closures increased to about 7,000 in 2013 before declining sharply to around 500 in 2015.
Between 2015 and 2018, the number of new shops opening gradually decreased, reaching a low of 3,000 by 2018. Meanwhile, shop closures stabilized around 5,000, showing minor fluctuations during this period.
In summary, the number of shop openings initially surpassed closures but declined steadily over time, while the number of closures, despite some fluctuations, remained relatively stable after a significant drop in 2015.
|
Gemini 7 分范文：
The line graph illustrates the fluctuations in shop closures and openings within a particular country from 2011 to 2018. Both metrics experienced significant changes over the given period, revealing distinct trends.
Overall, there was a general downward trajectory in the number of both shop closures and openings throughout the eight years. However, the rate of decline was more pronounced for shop openings. In 2011, the number of new shops opening stood at approximately 8,500, significantly higher than the 6,200 closures. Over the subsequent years, openings experienced a steady decrease, reaching a low of 4,000 in 2015 before partially recovering to 6,100 in 2014. In contrast, closures exhibited a more erratic pattern. After an initial increase from 2011 to 2013, closures plummeted dramatically in 2015, reaching a mere 600. From 2015 onwards, both closures and openings remained relatively stable but at lower levels compared to the earlier years.
Several factors could account for these trends. The rise of online shopping may have contributed to the decline in physical store openings. Additionally, economic downturns or shifts in consumer preferences may have led to increased shop closures.
In conclusion, the graph highlights a noticeable shift in the retail landscape of the country between 2011 and 2018. While both shop closures and openings experienced a general decline, the rate of decrease was more pronounced for new shop openings, suggesting a potential long-term trend towards a reduction in physical retail spaces.
|
Part 2
Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
| 我的原文 | GPT-o1 修改单词和语法错误 | There is a phenomenon in recent years, that more and more pacients try to use alternative medicines and treatments other than visiting their usual doctor. I don't think this is a good trend.
I can understand that why so many people choose alternatives rather than go to hospital to get help from doctors. One of the most important reason is that it might take a lot of time from making a reservation with doctor to waiting on line for a long time in hospital before they can meet doctors. While other reasons also vital. For instant, people might think there might be a lot of bacterias in the air in the hospital, and if they are exploseed in the environment, they might be affected and get more illness. Another reason maybe about expense, maybe it is cheaper to choose alertnatives.
But I still suggest going to doctors because they can give more acurite advices and medicines to pacients, besides, they have faced all kinds of people with health problems, they know the best way to ill.
There are many ways to solve those unconvinients. Firstly, if you want to save time, private hospitals will be a good choice. There are less people than in public hospitals, though the price might be higher and the proportion discount from medical insurence might be smaller. Taking me for an example. I usually go to private hospital, but sometimes I also met the situation that I need to wait hours on line, but I found there is a VIP service which can accelarate the speed of waiting, and I bought the VIP service for 200 RMB, and it saved me 3 hours.
Meanwhile, I think government shoul allocate more budgets to improve hospital service supplyments, so more people can get faster treatments and reduce the cost.
In conslusion, I think this is a negative development for people to try alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
| There is a phenomenon in recent years that more and more patients try to use alternative medicines and treatments rather than visiting their usual doctor. I don’t think this is a good trend.
I can understand why so many people choose alternatives rather than go to the hospital to get help from doctors. One of the most important reasons is that it might take a lot of time from making a reservation with a doctor to waiting in line for a long time in the hospital before they can meet doctors. Other reasons are also vital. For instance, people might think there might be a lot of bacteria in the air in the hospital, and if they are exposed to the environment, they might be affected and get more illness. Another reason may be about expense; maybe it is cheaper to choose alternatives.
But I still suggest going to doctors because they can give more accurate advice and medicines to patients; besides, they have faced all kinds of people with health problems, they know the best way to heal.
There are many ways to solve those inconveniences. Firstly, if you want to save time, private hospitals will be a good choice. There are fewer people than in public hospitals, though the price might be higher and the proportion discount from medical insurance might be smaller. Taking me for an example, I usually go to a private hospital, but sometimes I also meet the situation that I need to wait hours in line, but I found there is a VIP service which can accelerate the speed of waiting, and I bought the VIP service for 200 RMB, and it saved me 3 hours.
Meanwhile, I think the government should allocate more budgets to improve hospital service supplements, so more people can get faster treatments and reduce the cost.
In conclusion, I think this is a negative development for people to try alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
| 预估得分：GPT-4o 5；Claude 5-5.5；Copilot 5.5-6；Gemini 5-6
| 预估得分：GPT-4o 6；Claude 5.5-6；Copilot 6.5；Gemini 6-7
|
GPT-o1 7 分范文：
In recent years, a growing number of people with health issues are turning to alternative medicines and treatments instead of consulting their usual doctors. While this trend reflects a desire for more holistic approaches, I believe it is a negative development due to potential health risks and the lack of scientific validation.
Firstly, alternative medicines often lack rigorous testing and scientific evidence. Conventional medical treatments undergo extensive clinical trials to ensure their safety and efficacy. In contrast, many alternative therapies are based on anecdotal evidence or traditional practices without empirical support. For example, some individuals use herbal supplements to manage chronic illnesses like diabetes, which can lead to uncontrolled symptoms and serious complications due to improper dosing or interactions with other medications.
Secondly, relying on unproven treatments can delay proper diagnosis and effective care. When people opt for alternative remedies, they may forgo timely medical interventions that could prevent disease progression. A case in point is a colleague who chose homeopathic remedies for persistent stomach pains, only to discover later that he had an ulcer requiring conventional medical treatment. The delay not only prolonged his discomfort but also increased the risk of more severe health issues.
Moreover, alternative treatments are not always regulated, raising concerns about quality and safety. Without oversight, products may contain harmful substances or vary in potency. This lack of standardization can pose significant health risks, especially for vulnerable populations like the elderly or those with compromised immune systems.
In conclusion, while exploring different avenues for health and wellness is understandable, bypassing professional medical advice in favor of alternative treatments is a negative development. It can lead to adverse health outcomes due to unverified efficacy, delayed diagnoses, and safety concerns. Therefore, individuals should consult qualified healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about their health.
|
Claude 7 分范文：
The growing preference for alternative medicine over conventional medical treatments has become a notable trend in recent years. While this development offers certain benefits, I believe it also poses significant risks that need to be carefully considered.
On the positive side, alternative medicine often takes a holistic approach to health, considering not just physical symptoms but also mental and emotional well-being. For instance, traditional Chinese medicine practices like acupuncture and herbal remedies focus on restoring the body's natural balance rather than merely treating isolated symptoms. Additionally, these treatments typically have fewer side effects compared to conventional medications, making them particularly appealing to people who have experienced adverse reactions to pharmaceutical drugs. Another advantage is that alternative treatments often emphasize prevention and lifestyle modifications, which can lead to better long-term health outcomes.
However, the shift away from conventional medicine carries substantial risks. The most concerning aspect is that alternative treatments are often not subjected to the same rigorous scientific testing as conventional medicine. This lack of systematic research means that their effectiveness and safety cannot be guaranteed. For example, some herbal supplements can interact dangerously with prescription medications or may contain harmful ingredients. Furthermore, people who exclusively rely on alternative treatments might delay seeking necessary conventional medical care, potentially allowing serious conditions to worsen. A case in point would be cancer patients who might miss the critical window for effective treatment while pursuing unproven alternative therapies.
In my opinion, while alternative medicine can play a complementary role in healthcare, it should not completely replace conventional medical treatment. The ideal approach would be to integrate both forms of medicine, with patients consulting qualified healthcare professionals who can guide them in making informed decisions about their treatment options. This way, people can benefit from both the holistic approach of alternative medicine and the scientifically proven effectiveness of conventional treatments.
In conclusion, while the growing interest in alternative medicine has its merits, it would be unwise to completely abandon conventional medical care. The key lies in finding a balanced approach that combines the best aspects of both traditional and modern medicine while ensuring patient safety remains the top priority.
|
Copilot 7 分范文：
In recent times, an increasing number of individuals are opting for alternative medicines and treatments rather than consulting their regular doctors. This shift in healthcare choices raises the question of whether this trend is beneficial or detrimental. In my opinion, while alternative medicine can offer some advantages, it presents significant risks and should not be seen as a replacement for conventional medical care.
One of the main reasons people turn to alternative treatments is their perceived effectiveness in dealing with chronic conditions. For example, acupuncture has been praised for its ability to alleviate pain and stress, while herbal remedies are often sought after for their natural healing properties. These methods can provide comfort and relief, particularly when conventional medicine seems to offer no solution. Additionally, alternative treatments often focus on a holistic approach, treating the body and mind as interconnected systems, which can lead to a better overall sense of well-being.
However, the reliance on alternative medicines can be problematic. Firstly, many alternative treatments lack rigorous scientific validation. Unlike conventional medicines, which undergo extensive testing and clinical trials, alternative therapies often rely on anecdotal evidence. This means that their efficacy and safety are not guaranteed, potentially putting individuals at risk. For instance, herbal supplements can interact negatively with prescription medications, leading to severe health complications.
Furthermore, the delay in seeking professional medical advice can result in worsening health conditions. A person may forego visiting a doctor in favor of trying alternative remedies, only to discover too late that their condition requires urgent medical intervention. This delay can be life-threatening, especially in cases of serious diseases like cancer or heart conditions.
In conclusion, while alternative medicines and treatments can complement conventional healthcare, they should not replace it. The lack of scientific validation and potential health risks make it imperative for individuals to consult with their healthcare providers before opting for alternative treatments. A balanced approach that incorporates both conventional and alternative methods may offer the best outcomes for patients, ensuring they receive comprehensive and safe healthcare.
|
Gemini 7 分范文：
The burgeoning trend of individuals seeking alternative medicines and treatments over conventional medical care is a complex issue with multifaceted implications. While this shift may be driven by a desire for more holistic approaches to health and a growing distrust in Western medicine, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits against the risks.
On the one hand, the appeal of alternative therapies can be attributed to their emphasis on natural remedies and a more personalized approach to healing. Many individuals feel that conventional medicine often overlooks the root causes of their ailments and simply treats the symptoms. Alternative therapies, such as acupuncture, herbal medicine, and yoga, offer a holistic perspective that addresses both the physical and emotional aspects of well-being. Moreover, some people may be drawn to these treatments due to cultural or spiritual beliefs.
However, the increasing reliance on alternative therapies also raises several concerns. One major issue is the lack of rigorous scientific evidence to support the efficacy of many of these treatments. While anecdotal evidence and personal testimonials abound, controlled clinical trials are often lacking. Consequently, individuals may be putting their health at risk by delaying or foregoing conventional medical treatment in favor of unproven therapies. Additionally, the unregulated nature of the alternative medicine industry means that there is no guarantee of the quality or safety of the products or services being offered.
Furthermore, the growing popularity of alternative therapies can erode trust in the medical establishment and undermine the importance of evidence-based medicine. While it is essential to respect individual choices, it is equally important to promote critical thinking and to ensure that individuals have access to accurate and unbiased information about their health.
In conclusion, the rising popularity of alternative medicines and treatments is a double-edged sword. While these therapies may offer some benefits, it is crucial to approach them with caution and to be aware of the potential risks. A balanced approach that combines the best of both conventional and complementary medicine may be the most effective way to address complex health issues. Ultimately, individuals should consult with qualified healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about their treatment options.
|
|
|
